605 N.W.2d 320
No. 114498.Supreme Court of Michigan.
December 7, 1999.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 6, 1998, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court, but this is without prejudice to the defendant’s option of bringing a motion for relief from judgment and developing a reviewable record as was done in People v Lester, 232 Mich. App. 262; 591 N.W.2d 267 (1998).
Markman, J., not participating.
Court of Appeals No. 196156.
Page 931
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…