607 N.W.2d 366
No. 114653 (50).Supreme Court of Michigan.
January 11, 2000.
On order of the Court, the motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the April 23, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Cavanagh and Kelly, JJ., would remand this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for reconsideration under the analytical standard set forth in MCR 6.508(D)(3).
Court of Appeals No. 205081.
Reconsideration denied March 28, 2000.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…