PEOPLE v. WASKOSKI, 116746 (Mich. 5-1-2001)

627 N.W.2d 600

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT WAYNE WASKOSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 116746, 116754.Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 1, 2001.

COA: 223515, 223395, Genesee CC: 98-002366-FC, 98-002365-FC

On order of the Court, the delayed applications for leave to appeal from the February 24, 2000 and March 3, 2000 decisions of the Court of Appeals are considered and we ORDER the prosecutor to respond in writing, in this Court, to the defendant’s delayed applications for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order, with particular emphasis on the question whether the trial courts gave appropriate consideration to the option of imposing a blended sentence.

We retain jurisdiction.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. RAY, 43 Mich. App. 45 (1972)

204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…

9 years ago

DETROIT EDISON v. PSC, 221 Mich. App. 370 (1997)

562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. BUTTS, 144 Mich. App. 637 (1985)

376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. ZUNIGA, 56 Mich. App. 231 (1974)

223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. SIDNEY SMITH, 106 Mich. App. 310 (1981)

308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…

9 years ago

PEOPLE v. McELHANEY, 215 Mich. App. 269 (1996)

545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…

9 years ago