No. 115492-3.Supreme Court of Michigan.
April 25, 2000.
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the July 27, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and we DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to file an answer, within 28 days after the date of this order, focusing on the issue whether the defendant must be resentenced for his convictions in LC 98-003878 and LC 98-006301 because it was improper to change the concurrent sentences to consecutive sentences without a resentencing hearing. See People v. MilikTurner, 459 Mich. 923 (1998); People v. Miles, 454 Mich. 90 (1997);People v. Thomas, 223 Mich. App. 9 (1997); People v. Mapp, 224 Mich. App. 431 (1997), convening of special panel denied 224 Mich. App. 801 (1997), lv. den 456 Mich. 919 (1998).
The delayed application remains under consideration.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…