661 N.W.2d 242
No. 122745.Supreme Court of Michigan.
April 29, 2003.
COA: 228730, Saginaw CC: 99-018102-FC
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 29, 2002, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Because the Amended Judgment of Sentence was apparently not sent to, or recorded by, the Department of Corrections, we ORDER the Saginaw Circuit Court to immediately send to the Department of Corrections, the Amended Judgment of Sentence that reflects that defendant did not receive an enhanced sentence as an habitual offender.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…