No. 138417-8.Supreme Court of Michigan.
July 31, 2009.
Order
SC: 138417-8, COA: 279825; 279837, Wayne CC: 05-519094-NF
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).
I would grant leave to appeal to consider whether the Court of Appeals properly extended Darnell v Auto-Owners Ins Co, 142 Mich App 1 (1985), to hold defendant liable for plaintiff’s personal protection insurance benefits after defendant began paying those benefits, but then ceased after determining that another insurer had priority. Because Darnell supra at 12, considered a priority dispute in the context of determining liability for attorney fees pursuant to MCL 500.3148, I question its relevance in determining liability for actual benefits.
Page 1
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…