721 N.W.2d 586
No. 131247.Supreme Court of Michigan.
September 27, 2006.
Appeal from the Court of Appeals No. 266177.
Summary Dispositions September 27, 2006.
Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted, limited to the issues regarding insurance coverage and division of liability for payment of the workers’ compensation benefits awarded to plaintiff, and the issue
Page 872
of awarding attorney fees on unpaid medical expenses. In all other respects, leave to appeal is denied, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. We do not retain jurisdiction.
CORRIGAN, J. (concurring).
I concur in the order of remand, but I continue to adhere to the views that I expressed in my concurring statement in Donoho v Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, 474 Mich 1057 (2006).
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…