Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

PIASECKI v. MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-NEA, 464 Mich. 874 (2001)

630 N.W.2d 623

MARLENE PIASECKI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOSEPH K. PIASECKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-NEA, Defendant-Appellant, and WASHTENAW LIVINGSTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-MEA/NEA; WASHTENAW-LIVINGSTON EDUCATION BRIGHTON UNIT-MEA/NEA, and CHELSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Defendants. MARLENE PIASECKI, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOSEPH K. PIASECKI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-NEA, Defendant, and WASHTENAW LIVINGSTON EDUCATION ASSOCIATION-MEA/NEA; WASHTENAW-LIVINGSTON EDUCATION BRIGHTON UNIT-MEA/NEA, and CHELSEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 116128, 116134.Supreme Court of Michigan.
June 27, 2001.

COA: 208757, Washtenaw CC: 95-2378-NO.

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal from the October 15, 1999 decision of the Court of Appeals are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Markman, J., would grant leave to appeal.

jdjungle