PIONTEK v. ARMSTRONG, 468 Mich. 940 (2003)

664 N.W.2d 221

MICHAEL PIONTEK, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF MARGARET R. PIONTEK, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAMES ARMSTRONG, D.O., Defendant-Appellant, and WILLIAM RAMINICK, D.O., LOUIS TEGTMEYER, D.O., and GARDEN CITY OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL, Defendants.

No. 123075.Supreme Court of Michigan.
Decided June 30, 2003.

COA: 235792, Wayne CC: 00-021366-NH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2002 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of Grossman v Brown (Docket No. 122458) and Halloran v Bhan (Docket No. 121523) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in abeyance pending the decisions in those cases.