631 N.W.2d 342
No. 118968-9 (83)(84)(85)(86).Supreme Court of Michigan.
June 26, 2001.
COA: 215628 224623, WCAC: 97-0648.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion to file a delayed response are considered, and they are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal from the March 16, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals and the conditional application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are also considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to affirm is DENIED as moot.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…