616 N.W.2d 686
No. 116777 (11)(14).Supreme Court of Michigan.
May 16, 2000.
Appeal from COA: 225643, Wayne CC: 93-317974-CZ
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration, the motion for stay of enforcement of judgment, and the application for leave to appeal from the April 3, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals are considered. The motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we STAY enforcement of the trial court judgment pending the decision of the Court of Appeals in COA Nos. 196508 and 199441 and, if applicable, until this Court acts on a subsequent timely application for leave to appeal from the decision by the Court of Appeals. In the unique circumstances of this case, we are not persuaded that plaintiff should be allowed to enforce her judgment pending the completion of appellate review.
Page 861
Corrigan and Young, Jr., JJ., not participating.