Nos. 123114, 123115.Supreme Court of Michigan.
November 7, 2003.
Leave to Appeal Granted.
Nos. 123114, 123115. The parties are directed to include among the issues to be briefed
Page 956
(1) whether in light of all the facts of this case, including the work actually performed by the plaintiffs and their status as undocumented aliens, they were “under any contract of hire, express or implied” within the meaning of MCL 418.161(1)(1); (2) the meaning of the word “aliens” in the first clause of MCL 418.161(1)(1); (3) whether, in light of all the facts of this case, the plaintiffs were “unable to obtain or perform work because of . . . commission of a crime,” within the meaning of the final sentence of MCL 418.361(1); and (4) whether the Court of Appeals correctly determined that the plaintiffs should receive worker’s compensation benefits until the date when the defendant discovered their status as undocumented aliens. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the questions presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. Reported below:254 Mich App 651.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…