DENSMORE v. HOFFMAN-LAROCHE, INCORPORATED, 459 Mich. 903 (1998)

589 N.W.2d 283 DENSMORE v. HOFFMAN-LAROCHE, INCORPORATED. No. 110147.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 24, 1998. Summary Dispositions November 24, 1998. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission with the direction that it remand the case to the magistrate for reconsideration in light of Gardner v. […]

Read More

DUNN v. CONTROLLED PRECISION MACHINING, INC, 459 Mich. 909 (1998)

589 N.W.2d 283 DUNN v. CONTROLLED PRECISION MACHINING, INC. No. 111804.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 24, 1998. Leave to Appeal Denied November 24, 1998. Court of Appeals No. 207648. Motion for reconsideration dismissed upon stipulation of the parties on March 17, 1999, without prejudice and without costs.

Read More

JONES v. S. D. WARREN COMPANY, 459 Mich. 903 (1998)

589 N.W.2d 283 JONES v. S. D. WARREN COMPANY. No. 110575.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 24, 1998. Summary Dispositions November 24, 1998. In lieu of granting the plaintiff’s application for leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission with directions that it remand the case to the magistrate for reconsideration […]

Read More

GATICA v. HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER, 459 Mich. 904 (1998)

589 N.W.2d 283 GATICA v. HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER. No. 111751.Supreme Court of Michigan. November 24, 1998. Summary Dispositions November 24, 1998. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, the case is remanded to the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission with the direction that it remand the case to the magistrate for reconsideration in light of Layman […]

Read More

EWING v. ECORSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 111718 (Mich. 2-25-1999)

589 N.W.2d 283 FRANCIS C. EWING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ECORSE PUBLIC SCHOOLS and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees. No. 111718.Supreme Court of Michigan. February 25, 1999. On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of November 24, 1998 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order […]

Read More