Articles Tagged: 591 N.W.2d 38

591 N.W.2d 38 NORMAN REZMER and DONALD REZMER, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SCOTT ALTMAN, Defendant-Appellee, and JON ALTMAN and BROOK ALTMAN Defendants. No. 111682.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of November 24, 1998 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not […]

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. TORBERT. No. 112333.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 191426.

591 N.W.2d 38 KENNETH RENO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. YUNG A. CHUNG, M.D., Defendant-Appellee, and DONALD PORTICE, MARK TONGE, LARRY RUSHING and DAVID JOHNSON, Defendants. No. 107936.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. On order of the Court, the plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint is considered. To the extent that the motion requests the substitution of parties, […]

591 N.W.2d 38 SOWERBY v. PREVO’S FAMILY MARKET, INC, and BOULAHANIS v. PREVO’S FAMILY MARKET, INC, Nos. 112447, 112448.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Reported below: 230 Mich. App. 131.

591 N.W.2d 38 RAPANOS v. CITY OF MIDLAND. No. 112844.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 199909.

591 N.W.2d 38 RUSSELL v. SAGINAW COUNTY. No. 112657.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 208035.

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TYREE WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 111895.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Corrected April 6, 1999. By order of June 29, 1998, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision inPeople v. Childers (Docket No. 107636). On order of the […]

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. MICHAEL WATKINS. No. 112187.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 198826.

591 N.W.2d 38 ROBACK v. WOOD DIMENSIONS, INC. No. 112721.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 210202.

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. WIXSON. No. 112960.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. The defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). Court of Appeals No. 207783.

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. WARREN. No. 112816.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 191979.

591 N.W.2d 38 PIERRON v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION. No. 112745.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 201374. Page 959

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TYREE WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellee. No. 111895.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. By order of June 29, 1998, the application for leave to appeal was held in abeyance pending the decision inPeople v. Childers (Docket No. 107636). On order of the Court, the decision having […]

591 N.W.2d 38 PLAMONDON v. PLAMONDON. No. 112630.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Reported below: 230 Mich. App. 54.

591 N.W.2d 38 POCUS v. DETROIT COKE CORPORATION. No. 112963.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 211560.

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RUBY WILLIAMS. No. 112581.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. Court of Appeals No. 197253.

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. TIBBS. No. 112703.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. The defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). Court of Appeals No. 207144.

591 N.W.2d 38 JOHN R. PORTER, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant. No. 112965.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the Court does not find an abuse of discretion in the dismissal of the request for investigation.

591 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. DWAYNE WILLIAMS. No. 112969.Supreme Court of Michigan. March 30, 1999. The defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.502(G). Court of Appeals No. 211130.