PEOPLE v. ADRIAN, 460 Mich. 861 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES EARL ADRIAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113380Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the September 11, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are […]

Read More

MULHOLLAND v. MONTCALM COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, 460 Mich. 862 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 L. CHARLES MULHOLLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONTCALM COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113534Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the […]

Read More

LEAPHART v. STATE, 460 Mich. 864 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 KIRK LEAPHART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113586Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented […]

Read More

LENTINI v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 460 Mich. 867 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 JOSEPH LENTINI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 114464Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 29, 1998, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. ANDREWS, 460 Mich. 865 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TYRONE LEVEURN ANDREWS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113628Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 24, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. ANDERSON, 460 Mich. 863 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICTOR T. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113570Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 18, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. ANDERSON, 460 Mich. 863 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICTOR T. ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113570Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 18, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has […]

Read More

OGLESBY v. RECORDER’S COURT JUDGE, 112961 (Mich. 6-29-1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 JOSE ALLEN OGLESBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RECORDER’S COURT JUDGE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 112961.Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of April 27, 1999 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Read More

MILLER v. WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, 460 Mich. 865 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 CAITLYN MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113675Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the August 28, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions […]

Read More

McCLURE v. VOGT, 460 Mich. 860 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 BARBARA A. McCLURE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FRIEDA K. VOGT, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 113287-113290Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the June 23, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the […]

Read More

LACASSE v. LACASSE, 113736 (Mich. 6-29-1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 DENISE D. LACASSE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD G. LACASSE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113736.Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of March 23, 1999 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. Young, […]

Read More

KING v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 460 Mich. 865 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 KEVIN KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent-Appellee. No. 113665Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal the November 5, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions […]

Read More

MANSOUR v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, 460 Mich. 862 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 NABIL MANSOUR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 113483-113484Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should […]

Read More

LEE v. PAROLE BOARD, 460 Mich. 866 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 ROBERT LEE, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113968Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the court, the motion to consolidate is considered, and it is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the January 7, 1999 order of the Court of Appeals is also considered, and it […]

Read More

LONG v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, 460 Mich. 867 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 MICHAEL S. LONG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113530Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 4, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the […]

Read More

NEVIN v. EXCELLACARE INC, 460 Mich. 863 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 BARBARA NEVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EXCELLACARE INC, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113558Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 2, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the question presented […]

Read More

PAQUIN v. AZCO-HENNES, 460 Mich. 863 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 MICHAEL B. PAQUIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AZCO-HENNES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113576Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 6, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the questions presented […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. ALVERSON, 460 Mich. 864 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MARTIN A. ALVERSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113596Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the October 8, 1998, decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are […]

Read More

MAYWEATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 460 Mich. 865 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 BRUCE MAYWEATHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 113686Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the August 13, 1998, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the […]

Read More

PEOPLE v. BAILEY, 460 Mich. 866 (1999)

598 N.W.2d 340 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEROME BAILEY, a/k/a, MARK LEE PIPPEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 113762Supreme Court of Michigan. June 29, 1999. On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal the November 17, 1998 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because […]

Read More