627 N.W.2d 603 – LexRoll (MI)

KALUZNY v. KALUZNY, 464 Mich. 863 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 JUDITH G. KALUZNY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THOMAS J. KALUZNY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118869.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 232130, Oakland CC: 98-614892-DM On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the February 23, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED because […]

DUBUC v. STATE BD. OF LAW EXAMINERS, 118828 (Mich. 5-29-2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 DENNIS DUBUC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118828 (3).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion for immediate […]

BROWN v. MICHIGAN DEPT. OF CORR., 464 Mich. 863 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 CARSON BROWN, a/k/a KING ZULU AFRICAN JEW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118633.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 230697, Alger CC: 97-003037-AA On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the December 19, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, […]

MARSHALL v. MICHIGAN PAROLE BD., 464 Mich. 862 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 KENNETH MARSHALL Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118470.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 224647, Genesee CC: 97-056883-AP On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the December 13, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we […]

MARSHALL v. MICHIGAN PAROLE BD., 464 Mich. 862 (2001)

LARDIE v. LARDIE, 464 Mich. 863 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 DALE A. LARDIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SUSAN B. LARDIE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 119002 (24)(25).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 232201, Oakland CC: 97-541048-DM On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal from the March 23, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals […]

KOETJE v. KOETJE, 464 Mich. 863 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 CHAD K. KOETJE, JEFFERY A. KOETJE, and BRIAN L. KOETJE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONNA MAE KOETJE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119057 (42).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 227486, Kent CC: 00-003118-CZ On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is considered, and it is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal […]

CAMPAGNE v. CAMPAGNE, 464 Mich. 861 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 PAUL CAMPAGNE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GAIL CAMPAGNE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118415.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 215458, Oakland CC: 95-507508-DM On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the December 26, 2000, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not […]

PEARSON v. HORENSTEIN, 464 Mich. 863 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 SAMUEL PAUL PEARSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JOSEPH N. HORENSTEIN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118557.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 230473, Oakland CC: 98-009290-NM On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the November 7, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because […]

MROCZKOWSKI v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMM., 118524 (Mich. 5-29-2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 LEONARD MROCZKOWSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118524.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. AGC: 2934/99 On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the Court does not find an abuse of discretion in the dismissal of the request for investigation.

PEOPLE v. ALLEN, 464 Mich. 859 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN F. ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118305.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 216499, Wayne CC: 98-007793 On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the October 31, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

MILLER v. LOFGREN CONSTR. CO., 464 Mich. 858 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 FRANCES MILLER and EUGENE MILLER, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LOFGREN CONSTRUCTION CO., a/k/a LOFGREN HOMES, a/k/a LOFGREN ENVIRO, LOFGREN HOMES FURNITURE, INC., and RAYMOND D. LOFGREN, an individual, Defendants-Appellants. No. 118197.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 226408, Cheboygan CC: 95-005215-CH On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from […]

BROWER v. MICHIGAN PAROLE BD., 464 Mich. 862 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 ROGER LEE BROWER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118452.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 227680, Ingham CC: 99-091142-AW On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the December 28, 2000, order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we […]

BULLOCK v. MICHIGAN PAROLE BD., 464 Mich. 859 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 BENJAMIN LEN BULLOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118232.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 222377, Wayne CC: 98-832114-AP On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the October 20, 2000, decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and it is DENIED, because […]

PEOPLE v. BEAN, 464 Mich. 863 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ALBERT ALLEN BEAN, a/k/a DARON MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118423.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 230750, Wayne CC: 00-004351 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED because we are not persuaded that the […]

BOWEN v. DEPT. OF CORR., 464 Mich. 862 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 ROY BOWEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118495.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 230336, Marquette CC: 00-037587-AH On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the December 27, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we […]

HAM v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CAS. CO., 464 Mich. 857 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 WILMER HAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 117775.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 227119, Saginaw CC: 99-029559-CZ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the September 6, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, […]

PEOPLE v. BRISTOL, 464 Mich. 861 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RODNEY L. BRISTOL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118427.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 227080, Wayne CC: 95-005713 On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the December 8, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

NOWAK v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE CO./AMERITECH, 464 Mich. 861 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 LORRAINE J. NOWAK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY/AMERITECH, Self-Insured, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118420.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 228124, WCAC: 98-00529 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the December 27, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because […]

PEOPLE v. BROWN, 464 Mich. 857 (2001)

627 N.W.2d 603 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID ALLEN BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 117850.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 219817, Berrien CC: 98-404333-FH On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the August 18, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]