630 N.W.2d 335 DOUGLAS B. SUTTON and SANDRA K. SUTTON, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DANIEL KNIGHT, REBECCA KNIGHT, and YACHT SERVICES, UNLIMITED, Defendants-Appellees. No. 117957.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 226241, Grand Traverse CC: 99-19836-AV 86th District Ct: 98-5568-GC On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 3, 2000 […]
Articles Tagged: 630 N.W.2d 335
SUH-BYAS v. KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE, 464 Mich. 860 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 YANG J. SUH-BYAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KARMANOS CANCER INSTITUTE, formerly known as MICHIGAN CANCER FOUNDATION (HUMAN SERVICE ASSOCIATION), self-insured, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118314.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 230434, WCAC: 98-0181 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the December 7, 2000, decision of the Court of […]
YOUNCE v. HURST, 464 Mich. 860 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 BRADLEY YOUNCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DENNIS HURST, Former Prosecuting Attorney of Jackson County and JOHN McBAIN, Prosecuting Attorney, in their personal and official capacity, Defendants-Appellees. No. 118326.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 217790, Jackson CC: 97-082656-CZ On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the November […]
PEOPLE v. WATKINS, 464 Mich. 858 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TIMOTHY LEROY WATKINS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118193.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 229835, Livingston CC: 99-011062-FC On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the October 19, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]
THOMAS v. LAGRANGE, 464 Mich. 859 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 EDWIN THOMAS, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. DANIEL R. LAGRANGE, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and MADELON LAGRANGE, Defendant. No. 118248.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 223603, Genesee CC: 96-052624-CP On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 27, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is […]
THOMAS v. LAGRANGE, 464 Mich. 859 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 EDWIN THOMAS, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. DANIEL R. LAGRANGE, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, and MADELON LAGRANGE, Defendant. No. 118248.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 223603, Genesee CC: 96-052624-CP On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November 27, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is […]
PEOPLE v. WARD, 464 Mich. 859 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIE L. WARD, JR., Defendant-Appellant. No. 118231.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 228840, Genesee CC: 95-051949-FH On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the November 20, 2000, decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and […]
PEOPLE v. ZIEGLER, 118203 (Mich. 5-29-2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOSEPH RAYMOND ZIEGLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118203 (32).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 228951, Oakland CC: 93-129070-FH On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of February 26, 2001, is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does […]
PEOPLE v. BALDWIN, 464 Mich. 864 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM DAVID BALDWIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118204.Supreme Court of Michigan. June 6, 2001. COA: 228845, Oakland CC: 99-165726-FH On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the October 13, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]
PETERSEN v. TOTAL EMPLOYEE MGMT., 119022 (Mich. 6-4-2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 DENNIS F. PETERSEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. TOTAL EMPLOYEE MANAGEMENT and ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119022.Supreme Court of Michigan. June 4, 2001. COA: 230027, WCAC: 99-0173. On order of Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is […]
PEOPLE v. WHITE, 464 Mich. 863 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KALA B. WHITE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 116261 (29)(32).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 30, 2001. COA: 221694, Wayne CC: 98-006773, 98-006796 On September 12, 2000, we remanded this matter to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine the Page 864 date on which defendant filed with Judge […]
PFEIFER v. NORTHLAND ANESTHESIA ASSOC., 464 Mich. 858 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 LAUREN PFEIFER, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NORTHLAND ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendant-Appellant, and PROVIDENCE HOSPITAL, and IAN JACKSON M.D., Defendants. No. 118109.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 228006, Oakland CC: 96-528221-NZ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 27, 2000 decision of the Court of […]
WALSH v. DEPT. OF MGMT. AND BUDGET, 464 Mich. 860 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 PATRICK J. WALSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, an agency of the STATE OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118344.Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 219081, Ingham CC: 98-087917-NO On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the December 15, 2000 decision of the Court of […]
SMREKAR v. JEEP CORP., 464 Mich. 864 (2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 LAURA LEE SMREKAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEEP CORPORATION, AMERICAN MOTORS CORPORATION and CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants. No. 115382 (84).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 30, 2001. COA: 201521, Wayne CC: 94-424069-NP The order of the Court dated May 17, 2000 remanded this case to the Court of Appeals with instructions to issue a supplemental opinion […]
TAYLOR v. BAKERIES, 117436 (Mich. 5-29-2001)
630 N.W.2d 335 LYNN TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AWREY BAKERIES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. No. 117436 (25).Supreme Court of Michigan. May 29, 2001. COA: 227255, WCAC: 96-0635, 99-0048 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s order of January 30, 2001, is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the […]