Articles Tagged: 632 N.W.2d 145

632 N.W.2d 145 PEOPLE v. CADWELL. No. 118837.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 231576. Application for leave to appeal from the February 16, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant to M.C.R. 7.302 (F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND the case to the Court […]

632 N.W.2d 145 KOESTER v. KOESTER (WIECK). No. 118943.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 229765. Application for leave to appeal from the March 12, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 RAYMOND VAN SULLEN and LOUISE VAN SULLEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHAEL P. KELLY, ELIZABETH L. KELLY, WILFRED L. KELLY, CAROL S. KELLY, jointly and severally Defendants-Appellees. No. 118793.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 230654, St. Clair CC: 98-003410-CK On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the […]

632 N.W.2d 145 RAYMOND VAN SULLEN and LOUISE VAN SULLEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHAEL P. KELLY, ELIZABETH L. KELLY, WILFRED L. KELLY, CAROL S. KELLY, jointly and severally Defendants-Appellees. No. 118793.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 230654, St. Clair CC: 98-003410-CK On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the […]

632 N.W.2d 145 PEOPLE v. GHESQUIERE. No. 118990.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 232013. Application for leave to appeal from the March 23, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under M.C.R. 6.508(D).

632 N.W.2d 145 CLANTON v. INGHAM CIRCUIT JUDGE. No. 118672.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 229527. Application for leave to appeal from the November 28, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 ROY L THEBO, Plaintiff, v. TRI-CAST, INC., and HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants, and KURDZIEL IRON OF ROTHBURY, INC., and CITIZENS MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellees. No. 118717.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 228787, WCAC: 99-0379 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 9, 2001 decision […]

632 N.W.2d 145 PEOPLE v. MICKEY DAVIS. No. 118995.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 231612. Motion for immediate consideration is DENIED. Application for leave to appeal from the January 24, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED. Motion for stay is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 PEOPLE v. HANDSHOE. No. 119041.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 231645. Application for leave to appeal from the February 16, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 TOWNSHIP OF CASCO, TOWNSHIP OF COLUMBUS, and TOWNSHIP OF LENOX, all being Michigan Municipal Corporations, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MICHIGAN STATE BOUNDARY COMMISSION, Defendant-Appellee, and CITY OF RICHMOND, and WALTER K. WINKLE and PATRICIA A. WINKLE, Defendants-Respondents/Appellees. No. 118249 (88).Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 217621, St. Clair CC: 98-000886-AA On order […]

632 N.W.2d 145 JOHNSTON v. FORD MOTOR CO. No. 119136.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 230541. Application for leave to appeal from the April 11, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 PEOPLE v. COMACHO. No. 118999.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 232003. Application for leave to appeal from the February 14, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 CLANTON v. INGHAM CIRCUIT JUDGE. No. 119088.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA Nos. 231643, 231644. Application for leave to appeal from the February 14, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 PEOPLE v. THOMAS GREEN. No. 119033.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 231330. Application for leave to appeal from the March 1, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED.

632 N.W.2d 145 JONATHAN STONE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BUCKINGHAM COMPUTER SERVICES and CINCINNATI CASUALTY COMPANY, SECOND INJURY FUND/VOCATIONALLY HANDICAPPED PROVISIONS, Defendants-Appellants. No. 118737.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 231796, WCAC: 00-0100 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 23, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is […]

632 N.W.2d 145 MARY LOU WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant-Respondent. No. 118955.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. AGC: 3212/00 On order of the Court, the complaint for mandamus is considered, and it is DISMISSED, because the Court does not find an abuse of discretion in the dismissal of the request for investigation.

632 N.W.2d 145 JAMES F. SPLIT, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLODGETT HOSPITAL, SPECTRUM HEALTH CARE, NANCY KINGMAN, MARY MOORE, ELIZABETH LUCE, M.C., F. RAYMER LOVELL, M.D., SANDRA GLADDING, M.D., JOANNE FOLKERTS, and Jointly, Individually, and Severally, Defendants-Appellees. No. 118736.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 230454, Kent CC: 99-00292-CZ On order of the Court, the […]

632 N.W.2d 145 JAMES F. SPLIT, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLODGETT HOSPITAL, SPECTRUM HEALTH CARE, JOHN KELLER, M.D., SHARON VANDENEND, and SAUNRDA TORZA, Jointly and Individually, and Severally, Defendants-Appellees. No. 118735.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 230453, Kent CC: 98-13014-CZ On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the November […]

632 N.W.2d 145 PEOPLE v. ELDRIDGE. No. 118942.Supreme Court of Michigan. August 28, 2001. COA No. 232164. Application for leave to appeal from the March 19, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is DENIED because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under M.C.R. 6.508(D).

632 N.W.2d 145 JAMES W. ZERENNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BONNIE S. ZERENNER, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118674.Supreme Court of Michigan. July 30, 2001. COA: 219301, Kent CC: 97-010967-DO On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 2, 2001, decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we […]