Articles Tagged: 639 N.W.2d 256

639 N.W.2d 256 CHARLES F. BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., d/b/a SAM’S CLUB, Defendant-Appellee, and MARLIN McNICHOLS, JOYCE DOZIER McNICHOLS, d/b/a THE ORIGINAL KANSAS CITY COOKER, and JAMES PULLEY, Defendants. No. 119446.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 219203, Kalamazoo CC: 96-000949-NO On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal […]

639 N.W.2d 256 HESTER QUARRELLA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ACTION TREE SERVICE OF OAKLAND COUNTY, INC., a Michigan corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119469.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 20, 2001. COA: 233255, Oakland DC: 99-C02568-GC-1, Oakland CC: 00-007509-AV. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 25, 2001 decision of the Court of […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM C. BALLARD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 118667.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 219693, Wayne CC: 98-006509 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the February 2, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEFFREY DALE WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119365.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 20, 2001. COA: 229080, Grand Traverse CC: 00-008174-FH. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 11, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JEFFREY DALE WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119365.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 20, 2001. COA: 229080, Grand Traverse CC: 00-008174-FH. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 11, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASON DEMYERS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119054.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 219504, Ingham CC: 98-073971-FH On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the March 23, 2001, decision of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and it is […]

639 N.W.2d 256 JP ELECTRIC PROFESSIONALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOREST PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee. No. 119461.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 224677, Iron CC: 98-001191-CK On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 25, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, […]

639 N.W.2d 256 JUDITH A. SWAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOB MAXEY LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC. and SYLVIA MAXEY, Personal Representative of the Estate of ROBERT H. MAXEY, Jointly and Severally, Defendants-Appellees. No. 119218.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 216564, Wayne CC: 96-605022-CL On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the April […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEON LESHAWN ARTIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119320.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 217667, Oakland CC: 98-161297-FH On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 8, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DAVID OLIVERIO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119398.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 21, 2001. COA: 232480, Wayne CC: 00-001418-FH On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the April 23, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is […]

639 N.W.2d 256 CHARLES LEE HELTZEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CRYSTAL S. HELTZEL, a/k/a Crystal S. Tapia, Defendant-Appellant, and JOHN YONKERS and ROBIN YONKERS, Intervenors-Appellees. No. 120382.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 232736, Cass CC: 97-000316-DM On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the October 23, 2001 decision of the […]

639 N.W.2d 256 HENRY GIRARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DEARBORN CINEMAS, d/b/a NATIONAL AMUSEMENTS, INC., and STERLING HEATING COOLING, Defendants-Appellees. No. 119416.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 219871, Wayne CC: 98-808995-NO On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 18, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, […]

639 N.W.2d 256 WILFREDO CARDONA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. H. SCHIRP G.M.B.H. COMPANY K.G. d/b/a H. SCHIRP, Defendant-Appellee. No. 117418.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 21, 2001. COA: 219651, Ottawa CC: 96-024490-NO On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the July 28, 2000 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMES PAUL BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119455.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 232411, Oakland CC: 96-146347-FH On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal from the April 19, 2001, order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant […]

639 N.W.2d 256 DAVID A. MORAN, Petitioner, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 118637(6)(10).Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. AGC: 2794/99 On order of the Court, respondent’s motion for clarification of this Court’s September 11, 2001, order, and permission for a sealed ex parte response is considered, and it is GRANTED to the extent […]

639 N.W.2d 256 JACK FAXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHIGAN REPUBLICAN STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 118994.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 209786, Oakland CC: 96-416693-AV, 51st DC: GC-92-9020 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the January 30, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it […]

639 N.W.2d 256 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BENJAMIN HORTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 119329.Supreme Court of Michigan. December 27, 2001. COA: 220091, Livingston CC: 99-010824-FH On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the May 8, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED […]