704 N.W.2d 75 CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ACME TOWNSHIP v. ACME TOWNSHIP. No. 127487.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 29, 2005. Leave to Appeal Denied. SC: 127487, COA: 256403. The motions to extend time to file reply briefs are granted.
Articles Tagged: 704 N.W.2d 75
IN RE WHEAT, 474 Mich. 875 (2005)
704 N.W.2d 75 In re WHEAT (FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY v. AMERSON). No. 129487.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 29, 2005. Leave to Appeal Denied. SC: 129487, COA: 260200.
FERGUSON v. PIONEER STATE MUTUAL OF MICHIGAN, 474 Mich. 874 (2005)
704 N.W.2d 75 FERGUSON v. PIONEER STATE MUTUAL OF MICHIGAN. No. 129386.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 29, 2005. Summary Dispositions. SC: 129386, COA: 260876. The motion for immediate consideration is granted. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the August 16, 2005, order of the Court of Appeals and […]
MOORE v. MOORE, 128825 (Mich. 9-29-2005)
704 N.W.2d 75 HETTA MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLARKE A. MOORE, deceased, by the Estate of Clarke A. Moore, Defendant-Appellee. No. 128825 (45).Supreme Court of Michigan. September 29, 2005. SC: 128825, COA: 251822, Macomb CC: 98-3538-DO. On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 2005 judgment of the Court of […]
THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CT. v. JUDICIAL ATTORNEYS 129500-1 (Mich. 9-29-2005)
704 N.W.2d 75 THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE JUDICIAL ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 129500-1 (30)(31).Supreme Court of Michigan. September 29, 2005. SC: 129500-1, COA: 262586, 263413, Wayne CC: 00-004468-CK. On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The motion for stay of proceedings is GRANTED, and the Wayne Circuit […]
CROUCHMAN v. MOTOR CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY, 474 Mich. 873 (2005)
704 N.W.2d 75 CROUCHMAN v. MOTOR CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY. No. 127871.Supreme Court of Michigan. September 29, 2005. SC: 127871. Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action Page 874 permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues […]
CITY OF TAYLOR v. THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY, 474 Mich. 877 (2005)
704 N.W.2d 75 CITY OF TAYLOR v. THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY. No. 127580.Supreme Court of Michigan. October 6, 2005. Leave to Appeal Granted. SC: 127580. The parties shall address what powers the city has over utilities under its constitutional authority to exercise reasonable control over its streets, whether that authority invariably allows the city to […]