Categories: Michigan Supreme Court Opinions

TINGLEY v. WARDROP, 476 Mich. 861 (2006)

717 N.W.2d 878

WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, III, WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, and DANIEL R. BRADLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and PROTO-CAM, INC., BEND TOOLING, INC., and TENNINE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT F. WARDROP, II, WILLIAM J. FISHER III, TODD R. DICKINSON, WARDROP WARDROP, P.C., DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC, FISHER DICKINSON, P.C., 900 MONROE LLC, 940 MONROE LLC, PIONEER INCORPORATED, DYKEMA EXCAVATORS, INC., and FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, Defendants, and CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS and JOHN H. LOGIE, Defendants-Appellants. WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, III, WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, and DANIEL R. BRADLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and PROTO-CAM, INC., BEND TOOLING, INC., and TENNINE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT F. WARDROP, II, WILLIAM J. FISHER III, TODD R. DICKINSON, WARDROP WARDROP, P.C., DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC, FISHER DICKINSON, P.C., DYKEMA EXCAVATORS, INC., FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, and JOHN H. LOGIE Defendants, and 900 MONROE LLC, 940 MONROE LLC, and PIONEER INCORPORATED, Defendants-Appellants. WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, III, WILLIAM Q. TINGLEY, and DANIEL R. BRADLEY, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and PROTO-CAM, INC., BEND TOOLING, INC., and TENNINE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, v. ROBERT F. WARDROP, II, WILLIAM J. FISHER III, TODD R. DICKINSON, WARDROP WARDROP, P.C., DICKINSON WRIGHT, PLLC, FISHER DICKINSON, P.C., 900 MONROE LLC, 940 MONROE LLC, PIONEER INCORPORATED, CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, JOHN H. LOGIE, and FIFTH THIRD BANCORP, Defendants, and DYKEMA EXCAVATORS, INC.,

Nos. 128901, 128907, 128909.Supreme Court of Michigan.
July 31, 2006.

SC: 128901, COA: 243171, Kent CC: 02-003723-NZ.

SC: 128907, COA: 243171, Kent CC: 02-003723-NZ.

SC: 128909, COA: 243171, Kent CC: 02-003723-NZ.

Reconsideration Denied July 31, 2006.

Summary disposition entered at 474 Mich 1104.

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ.

We would grant the motion for reconsideration.

WEAVER, J. (dissenting).

For the reasons stated in my dissent to the order in this matter, which issued April 7, 2006, I would grant reconsideration and deny leave to appeal. 474 Mich 1104 (2006) (WEAVER, J., dissenting).

jdjungle