649 N.W.2d 74
No. 120751.Supreme Court of Michigan.
July 17, 2002.
COA: 223204, Oakland CC: 93-448541-CZ
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the December 18, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(F)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND the case to the Oakland Circuit Court for reinstatement of that court’s decision dismissing the complaint. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case for lack of progress. See Alken-Ziegler, Inc vWaterbury Headers Corp, 461 Mich. 219 (1999).
Kelly, J., would deny leave to appeal.
204 N.W.2d 38 PEOPLE v. RAY Docket No. 12187.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided September 27,…
562 N.W.2d 224 DETROIT EDISON COMPANY v PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Docket Nos. 177054, 177055, 177062,…
376 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v BUTTS Docket No. 80186.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided August 5,…
223 N.W.2d 652 PEOPLE v ZUNIGA Docket No. 17453.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided October 21,…
308 N.W.2d 176 PEOPLE v SIDNEY SMITH Docket No. 50618.Michigan Court of Appeals. Decided March…
545 N.W.2d 18 PEOPLE v McELHANEY Docket No. 162330.Michigan Court of Appeals.Submitted November 15, 1995,…